Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp.

421 So. 2d 695, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21510

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 5, 1982

DocketNo. 81-2384

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 421 So. 2d 695 (Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp., 421 So. 2d 695, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21510 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the record and briefs in this case, we have concluded that the trial court erred in reasoning that the riprap and bedding stone was delivered “as needed” in accordance with the contract terms solely on the basis of its finding that the progress of the construction project in which appellant Servidone Construction Corporation was engaged was not impeded by the absence of materials appellee Southeast Materials Corporation was to supply. Nevertheless, the remaining findings by the trial court are supported by the evidence and are sufficient to sustain the final judgment.

Accordingly, the final judgment is AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the record and briefs in this case, we have concluded that the trial court erred in reasoning that the riprap and bedding stone was delivered “as needed” in accordance with the contract terms solely on the basis of its finding that the progress of the construction project in which appellant Servidone Construction Corporation was engaged was not impeded by the absence of materials appellee Southeast Materials Corporation was to supply. Nevertheless, the remaining findings by the trial court are supported by the evidence and are sufficient to sustain the final judgment.

Accordingly, the final judgment is AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 So. 2d 695, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/servidone-construction-corp-v-southeast-materials-corp-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack