Perry v. Young

444 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11471
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 25, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1106
StatusPublished

This text of 444 So. 2d 553 (Perry v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Young, 444 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by competent, substantial evidence and that any error made by the court in stating the grounds for its decision was harmless. See generally, Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp., 421 So.2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) and In re Estate of Hammermann, 387 So.2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Accordingly, the judgment is hereby affirmed.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Hammermann
387 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp.
421 So. 2d 695 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-young-fladistctapp-1984.