Perry v. Young

444 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11471
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 1984·No. No. 83-1106·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by competent, substantial evidence and that any error made by the court in stating the grounds for its decision was harmless. See generally, Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp., 421 So.2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) and In re Estate of Hammermann, 387 So.2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Accordingly, the judgment is hereby affirmed.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. Young, 444 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

444 So. 2d 553 (Perry v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Hammermann
387 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp.
421 So. 2d 695 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)