Servido v. Superintendent of Insurance
This text of 425 N.E.2d 886 (Servido v. Superintendent of Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, with costs, for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (77 AD2d 70, 76-86) and case remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for determination of benefits claimed.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Judge Meyer concurs in an opinion in which Judge Jasen concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
425 N.E.2d 886, 53 N.Y.2d 1041, 442 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/servido-v-superintendent-of-insurance-ny-1981.