Serrano v. State

170 So. 3d 914, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11276, 2015 WL 4522636
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 2015
DocketNo. 1D14-5789
StatusPublished

This text of 170 So. 3d 914 (Serrano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Serrano v. State, 170 So. 3d 914, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11276, 2015 WL 4522636 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the supreme court has determined that Miller v. Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455 (2012), applies retroactively, we affirm the trial court’s order on appeal, but without prejudice to the appellant filing a timely rule 3.850 motion seeking an individualized resentencing hearing pursuant to Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393 (Fla.2015). See Falcon v. State, 2015 WL 1239365 (Fla.2015).

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Florida v. Anthony Duwayne Horsley, Jr.
160 So. 3d 393 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Rebecca Lee Falcon v. State of Florida
162 So. 3d 954 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 So. 3d 914, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11276, 2015 WL 4522636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serrano-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.