Serrano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Serrano v. State

128 So. 3d 157, 2013 WL 5951840, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17836

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 8, 2013

DocketNo. 2D11-477

StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 3d 157 (Serrano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Serrano v. State, 128 So. 3d 157, 2013 WL 5951840, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17836 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments and sentences in this case without prejudice to Miguel A. Serrano’s right to file a timely motion for postconviction relief. Any claim alleging ineffective assistance of counsel based on the fact that his attorney also represented his codefendant in a separate trial shall not be regarded as duplicative of issues raised in this direct appeal.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, CASANUEVA, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments and sentences in this case without prejudice to Miguel A. Serrano’s right to file a timely motion for postconviction relief. Any claim alleging ineffective assistance of counsel based on the fact that his attorney also represented his codefendant in a separate trial shall not be regarded as duplicative of issues raised in this direct appeal.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, CASANUEVA, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 3d 157, 2013 WL 5951840, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serrano-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.