Serrano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Serrano v. State

128 So. 3d 157, 2013 WL 5951840, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17836

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Serrano v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21964 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 2013·No. No. 2D11-477·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments and sentences in this case without prejudice to Miguel A. Serrano’s right to file a timely motion for postconviction relief. Any claim alleging ineffective assistance of counsel based on the fact that his attorney also represented his codefendant in a separate trial shall not be regarded as duplicative of issues raised in this direct appeal.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, CASANUEVA, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments and sentences in this case without prejudice to Miguel A. Serrano’s right to file a timely motion for postconviction relief. Any claim alleging ineffective assistance of counsel based on the fact that his attorney also represented his codefendant in a separate trial shall not be regarded as duplicative of issues raised in this direct appeal.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, CASANUEVA, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Serrano v. State, 128 So. 3d 157, 2013 WL 5951840, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17836 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

128 So. 3d 157 (Serrano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.