Serna v. Young
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
ANTONIO LOPEZ SERNA,
Petitioner,
v. No. 24-cv-663 KWR/SCY
FNU YOUNG, et al.,
Respondents.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
THIS MATTER is before the Court following Petitioner Antonio Lopez Serna’s failure to prosecute his Civil Complaint (Doc. 1), in which Petitioner appears to challenge his custody and calculation of his good time credits. Petitioner filed his pro se Complaint on June 28, 2024 while he was incarcerated at the Lea County Correctional Facility. By Order entered February 7, 2025, the Court noted the New Mexico Corrections Department inmate locator website reflects Petitioner is no longer in custody, and he has not provided a current address as required by D.N.M. LR-Civ. 83.6. See (Doc. 8); https://www.cd.nm.gov/offender-search. The Court directed Petitioner to update his address in writing within thirty days. (Doc. 8). The Order warned that the failure to timely comply may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Id. The deadline to provide a new address was March 10, 2025. Petitioner did not comply or otherwise respond to the Order. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) “for failure to prosecute or comply with the rules of civil procedure or court orders.” Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003). To the extent necessary, the Court will also deny a certificate of appealability (COA) under Habeas Corpus Rule 11, as this ruling is not reasonably debatable. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (COA may only issue where reasonable jurists would debate the outcome of the habeas case); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (same). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner Antonio Lopez Serna’s Civil Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and the
Court will enter a separate judgment closing this civil case. SO ORDERED.
_______/S/__________________________ HON. KEA RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Serna v. Young (Serna v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.