Serbrena Booker v. Ga Dhr

• Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
• Decided: August 14, 2012
• Docket: A12A1539
• Status: Published

Opinion

SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., ADAMS and MCFADDEN, JJ.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/

August 14, 2012

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A12A1539. BOOKER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES.

MCFADDEN, Judge.

Pursuant to a request filed by the Georgia Department of Human Resources,

the trial court held that Serbrena Booker’s son was emancipated because he had

reached the age of majority and was not enrolled in and attending a secondary school;

thus, the court held, under OCGA § 19-6-15 (e) the son’s father no longer was

obligated to pay child support. Because Booker has failed to comply with the

discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-35, but instead has filed a direct

appeal from this ruling, we must dismiss the appeal.

“OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2) provides, without exception, that appeals in ‘domestic

relations cases’ must be brought by application for discretionary appeal.” Walker v. Estate of May, 279 Ga. 652, 653 (1) (619 SE2d 679) (2005). This is a domestic

relations case subject to review only by application because its underlying subject

matter is a father’s obligation to provide child support for his son. See Camp v. Camp,

247 Ga. 533 (277 SE2d 55) (1981); Davis v. Welch, 205 Ga. App. 462, 463 (422

SE2d 323) (1992). This case falls within OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2) even though it was

initiated by the Department of Human Resources. See Fitzgerald v. Dept. of Human

Resources, 231 Ga. App. 129 (497 SE2d 659) (1998) (appeal from order modifying

child support obligation in case initiated by Department of Human Resources must

be brought as discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), among other

subsections).

“Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.

Therefore, [Booker’s] failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA

§ 5-6-35 deprives this Court of jurisdiction, and [her] appeal must be dismissed.”

(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Fitzgerald, supra, at 129-130.

Appeal dismissed. Barnes, P. J., and Adams, J., concur.