Sepulveda v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided June 22, 1999·No. 98-2065·Unpublished

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 98-2065

EDGAR SEPULVEDA,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Respondent, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Shane Devine, Senior District Judge]

Before

Lynch, Circuit Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.

Edgar Sepulveda on brief pro se. Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and Peter E. Papps, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition for appellee.

June 16, 1999

Per Curiam. Having carefully reviewed the decision below in light of the briefs and the record on appeal, we find no prejudicial error nor abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of appellant's motion to set aside an earlier final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sepulveda v. United States, (1st Cir. 1999).

Sepulveda v. United States (Sepulveda v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.