Sepulveda v. United States
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-1683
DAVID SEPULVEDA,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Respondent, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Shane Devine, Senior District Judge]
Before
Selya, Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
David Sepulveda on brief pro se. Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney and Peter E. Papps, First Assistant U.S. Attorney on Motion for Summary Disposition for appellee.
December 10, 1998
Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the district court's decision, in light of the parties' briefs, and the record on appeal, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of appellant's motion to set aside its earlier final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). Affirmed.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sepulveda v. United States (Sepulveda v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.