Sepulvado v. Jindal
This text of 739 F.3d 716 (Sepulvado v. Jindal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. .35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
. In the en banc poll, 4 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges King, Dennis, Prado, and Graves), and 11 judges voted •against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, Elrod, South wick, Haynes, and Higginson).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 F.3d 716, 2013 WL 6912820, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sepulvado-v-jindal-ca5-2013.