Senior Care Group, Inc. v. Estate of Fischer Ex Rel. Woodworth

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Senior Care Group, Inc. v. Estate of Fischer Ex Rel. Woodworth

12 So. 3d 766, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 766, 2009 WL 284902

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 2009

Docket2D08-4788

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 So. 3d 766 (Senior Care Group, Inc. v. Estate of Fischer Ex Rel. Woodworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Senior Care Group, Inc. v. Estate of Fischer Ex Rel. Woodworth, 12 So. 3d 766, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 766, 2009 WL 284902 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

Petitioners request certiorari review of paragraphs one and two of a nonfinal order granting respondent’s motion to compel. We dismiss as premature the portion of the petition challenging paragraph one, compelling petitioners to produce certain documents to the trial court for in camera inspection. See Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Richardson, 938 So.2d 570 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). We deny the petition as to paragraph two, compelling petitioners to produce to respondents those documents specific to the deceased, Ora Fischer, because petitioners abandoned any objection at the hearing.

ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaROSE, Judge.

Petitioners request certiorari review of paragraphs one and two of a nonfinal order granting respondent’s motion to compel. We dismiss as premature the portion of the petition challenging paragraph one, compelling petitioners to produce certain documents to the trial court for in camera inspection. See Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Richardson, 938 So.2d 570 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). We deny the petition as to paragraph two, compelling petitioners to produce to respondents those documents specific to the deceased, Ora Fischer, because petitioners abandoned any objection at the hearing.

ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 So. 3d 766, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 766, 2009 WL 284902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senior-care-group-inc-v-estate-of-fischer-ex-rel-woodworth-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack