CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION v. Richardson
This text of 938 So. 2d 570 (CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Petitioner,
v.
DAN K. RICHARDSON and YUEH-CHAO RICHARDSON, Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
R.G. (Mack) McCormick, Jr., of Haas, Dutton, Blackburn, Lewis, Longley and Lee, P.L., Tampa, for Petitioner.
Bruce A. Aebel of Fowler White Boggs Banker P.A., Tampa, for Respondents.
FULMER, Chief Judge.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. With respect to that portion of the trial court's order addressing Request for Production No. 5, which directs Citizens Property Insurance Corporation to provide all allegedly privileged documents to the trial court for an in camera inspection, we conclude that certiorari relief is premature. See Cape Canaveral Hosp. v. Leal, 917 So. 2d 336, 339-40 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
Denied; remanded for further proceedings.
WHATLEY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
938 So. 2d 570, 2006 WL 2632434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-property-insurance-corporation-v-richardson-fladistctapp-2006.