Senfour Investment Co., Inc. v. King County

385 U.S. 1
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1966·No. 93·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Senfour Investment Co., Inc. v. King County, 385 U.S. 1 (1966).

385 U.S. 1 (Senfour Investment Co., Inc. v. King County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. Schriro
Ninth Circuit, 2008
Air Line Pilots v. Guilford Transp.
2004 DNH 139 (D. New Hampshire, 2004)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1984
State v. Jasper
521 S.W.2d 182 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1975)
Tagawa v. Maui Publishing Company
448 P.2d 337 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Merridith
433 S.W.2d 578 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1968)
State v. Lay
427 S.W.2d 394 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1968)