Senesac v. Senesac
365 A.2d 977, 134 Vt. 612, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 777
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Senesac v. Senesac. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Vt. 24 →
Opinion
Appellant’s motion to recommit this cause to the Chittenden Superior Court pending appeal is granted, and the same is remanded to that court for the sole purpose of hearing and determining his motion to revise the judgment order and for restraining order, with direction to advance said cause upon the docket and to report to this Court its action upon said motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Senesac v. Senesac, 365 A.2d 977, 134 Vt. 612, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 777 (Vt. 1976).
365 A.2d 977 (Senesac v. Senesac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.