Senesac v. Senesac
365 A.2d 977, 134 Vt. 612, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 777
This text of 365 A.2d 977 (Senesac v. Senesac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Senesac v. Senesac, 365 A.2d 977, 134 Vt. 612, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 777 (Vt. 1976).
Opinion
Appellant’s motion to recommit this cause to the Chittenden Superior Court pending appeal is granted, and the same is remanded to that court for the sole purpose of hearing and determining his motion to revise the judgment order and for restraining order, with direction to advance said cause upon the docket and to report to this Court its action upon said motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
365 A.2d 977, 134 Vt. 612, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senesac-v-senesac-vt-1976.