Sells v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Sells v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

214 So. 3d 1232

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 2017

DocketNo. SC15-1639

StatusPublished

This text of 214 So. 3d 1232 (Sells v. CSX Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sells v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 214 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Sells v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 170 So.3d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. CANADY, J., concurs in result. PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Sells v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 170 So.3d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. CANADY, J., concurs in result. PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 So. 3d 1232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sells-v-csx-transportation-inc-fla-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack