Sellers v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co.

118 S.W.2d 612, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 5
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 25, 1938
DocketNo. 10312.
StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.W.2d 612 (Sellers v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sellers v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co., 118 S.W.2d 612, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 5 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

MURRAY, Justice.

This cause was submitted in this Court on April 27, 1938, and on the day of submission appellant filed a motion asking for a postponement .of the submission of the cause, for the reason that her attorneys had just discovered certain interlineations in the statement of facts, which were not in the handwriting of the official court reporter who prepared the statement of facts, and which had been made after the court reporter had filed the statement of facts with the clerk of the trial court.

There is no contention made that the in-terlineations had not been made before the attorneys for both sides agreed to the statement of facts and the same was approved by the trial judge.

Under such circumstances, we find no good reason why submission should have been postponed, and therefore overrule the motion and hold the cause was properly submitted in its regular order on the docket.

This suit was instituted in the 57th District Court of Bexar County by Mabel Kline Sellers against Great Southern Life Insurance Company, seeking to recover upon a life insurance policy of the life of Burrell Oscar Sellers, now deceased. The policy provided for the payment of the sum of $60 per month for a period of ten years.

The trial was begun to a jury, but at the close of the evidence, by agreement of both parties, the jury was discharged and the cause submitted to the court for his determination on both the facts and the law. Thereupon the court proceeded to render judgment against Mabel Kline Sellers, and in favor of the Great Southern Life Insurance Company, from which judgment Mabel Kline Sellers has prosecuted this appeal.

At the request of appellant the trial judge made and filed the following findings of fact:

“1. That on or about December 28, 1926, the defendant, Great Southern Life Insurance Company, issued and delivered its policy of insurance No. 156041, bearing date of December 28, 1926, upon the life of Burrell Oscar Sellers, said policy providing for an annual premium of $212.16, payable in advance on the 28th day of December each year until insured’s death, or until he attained the age of 85, said policy obligating the insurer in the event of insured’s death to pay upon the terms and conditions therein stated to Mabel Kline Sellers, the beneficiary, the sum of $60.00 per month for 120 months, the first monthly payment to be made immediately upon receipt of proof of death, a copy of which policy is hereto attached and marked “Exhibit A.”
“2. That said insured diqd May 10, 1932.
“3. That on May 25, 1933, Carter & Carter, attorneys of San Antonio, then representing the plaintiff herein, wrote the defendant a letter demanding payment on said policy, which letter was received by the defendant in the due course of mail, and was answered by the defendant on May 26, 1933.
“4. That no sum has been paid by the defendant to the plaintiff herein on account of the amount alleged to be due upon said policy of insurance.
“5. The following transactions with reference to premium payment, premium notes and policy loans were had between the insured and the insurer, Great Southern Life Insurance Company:
*614 “(a) The first annual premium m the sum of $212.16, due December 28, 1926, was paid in cash to the insurer, and recorded on its permanent records January 7, 1927.
“(b) The second annual premium due December 28, 1927, was handled thus:
“The insured paid to the insurer in cash on account of said premium the sum of $112.16, which was recorded ‘paid’ on the insurer’s original record January 25, 1928.
“The insured also executed and delivered to the Great Southern Life Insurance Company his premium note dated December 28, 1928, for the sum of $100.00, said $100.00 note and $6.00 interest, being interest on $100.00 for a year, were paid to the insurer, and payment recorded by it on its permanent record December 29, 1928, and said note was surrendered to the insured.
“(c) On December 28, 1928, the insured in extension of the third year’s premium gave a note for $212.16, the amount of said premium, said note being due December 28, 1929, which note and $10.60 interest due November 2, 1929, was on the permanent records of the insurer recorded ‘Paid November 2, 1929/ and said note was surrendered to the insured.
“(d) Bearing date of October 31, 1929, insured executed his policy loan note in the sum of $200.00, due on or before December 28, 1929, same being recorded on the permanent loan and lien records of the insurer November 2, 1929.
“On November 2, 1929, the insured paid to the insurer $24.76, being the difference between the amount necessary in excess of the $200.00 policy loan note to retire the $212.16 premium note due December 28, 1929, and interest in the sum of $10.60, accrued thereon to November 2, 1929, and $2.00 interest in advance on the $200.00 policy loan note to its due date, which was December 28, 1929. The account between the insurer and the insured being settled thus:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Hamrick
94 S.W.2d 421 (Texas Supreme Court, 1936)
Butler v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.
113 S.W.2d 971 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Guaranty Mortgage & Realty Co. v. Whitham
93 S.W.2d 512 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Kennedy v. McMullen
39 S.W.2d 168 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Bustamante v. Haynes
55 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Still v. Moffett
93 S.W.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Stout v. Sommers
28 S.W.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Sweatt v. Tarrant County
108 S.W.2d 700 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Stillman v. Hirsch
99 S.W.2d 270 (Texas Supreme Court, 1936)
Roberson v. Hughes
231 S.W. 734 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1921)
Blackmon v. Trail
12 S.W.2d 967 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1929)
Natkin Engineering Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.
37 S.W.2d 740 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1931)
Sommers v. Stout
44 S.W.2d 901 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1932)
Lamar-Delta County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 2 v. Dunn
61 S.W.2d 816 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1933)
Western Union Life Co. of Houston v. Ensminger
103 S.W.2d 162 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.W.2d 612, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellers-v-great-southern-life-ins-co-texapp-1938.