Sellars v. Redondo

270 A.D.2d 407, 704 N.Y.S.2d 881
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 2000·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated March 20, 1998, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Sellars v Redondo, 270 AD2d 407 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sellars v. Redondo, 270 A.D.2d 407, 704 N.Y.S.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 407 (Sellars v. Redondo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rubina v. City of New York
51 A.D.3d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Weintraub v. Levine
22 A.D.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Wiwigac v. Snedaker
282 A.D.2d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Trane Co. v. 401 Broad Hollow Realty Corp.
272 A.D.2d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)