SELITA BOYD v. GB RESTORATION SERVICES, LLC
This text of SELITA BOYD v. GB RESTORATION SERVICES, LLC (SELITA BOYD v. GB RESTORATION SERVICES, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ October 22, 2024
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A24A0732. BOYD et al. v. GB RESTORATION SERVICES, LLC.
Selita and Eloise Boyd, plaintiffs in the underlying action, appeal from what purports to be a final order in this case. But that order resolves only the claims of Selita Boyd. The order identifies only Selita Boyd as the plaintiff, uses only the singular form of the word “plaintiff,” and expressly states that Selita Boyd “is the sole party in this case in the Court’s record.” The record on appeal, however, shows that Eloise Boyd is also a plaintiff in this action. The complaint lists Eloise Boyd as a plaintiff both in its caption and in its description of the parties to the action, and it states claims on behalf of Eloise Boyd, who both electronically signed the complaint (as a pro se plaintiff) and physically signed a verification of it. We have found nothing in the record indicating that Eloise Boyd’s claims have been resolved. Consequently, Eloise Boyd’s claims remain pending below. See OCGA § 9-11- 54 (b). “Because this case is still pending in the trial court and there are issues remaining to be resolved, the [order on appeal] is not appealable as a final judgment.” City of Dublin School Dist. v. MMT Holdings, 351 Ga. App. 112, 115 (830 SE2d 487) (2019). See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). And it is not one of the other specific types of trial court rulings for which a direct appeal is permitted under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a). Instead, the trial court’s order is subject to the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Because Selita Boyd did not comply with those requirements, we lack jurisdiction. Athens Heart Center v. Molina, 370 Ga. App. 190, 194 (895 SE2d 518) (2023). We hereby DISMISS the appeal.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/22/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SELITA BOYD v. GB RESTORATION SERVICES, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selita-boyd-v-gb-restoration-services-llc-gactapp-2024.