Selimanjin v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Selimanjin v. New York City Housing Authority

275 A.D.2d 408, 712 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8856

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 21, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 408 (Selimanjin v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selimanjin v. New York City Housing Authority, 275 A.D.2d 408, 712 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated September 23, 1999, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The Supreme Court erred when it denied the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. The defendant failed to rebut the inference of negligence arising from the rear-end collision (see, Levine v Taylor, 268 AD2d 566; Leal v Wolff, 224 AD2d 392; Silberman v Surrey Cadillac Limousine Serv., 109 AD2d 833). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated September 23, 1999, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The Supreme Court erred when it denied the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. The defendant failed to rebut the inference of negligence arising from the rear-end collision (see, Levine v Taylor, 268 AD2d 566; Leal v Wolff, 224 AD2d 392; Silberman v Surrey Cadillac Limousine Serv., 109 AD2d 833). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 408, 712 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selimanjin-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack