Silberman v. Surrey Cadillac Limousine Service, Inc.

109 A.D.2d 833, 486 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47343
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by57 cases

This text of 109 A.D.2d 833 (Silberman v. Surrey Cadillac Limousine Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silberman v. Surrey Cadillac Limousine Service, Inc., 109 A.D.2d 833, 486 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants Surrey Cadillac Limousine Service, Inc., and Louis Bianco appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), entered July 13, 1984, which granted plaintiffs Serge Silberman’s and Irene Silberman’s motion for summary judgment against appellants, ordered an assessment of damages, and severed the action against defendant Rena Hoffman.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The Silbermans’ claims are based upon injuries sustained when a vehicle in which plaintiff Serge Silberman was riding as a passenger, which was owned by appellant Surrey Cadillac Limousine Service, Inc., and was operated by appellant Louis Bianco, ran into the rear end of the vehicle in front. The only explanation provided by appellants for the accident is that the vehicle in front had stopped suddenly and without warning. Based on these facts, Special Term granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment. Appellants contend that this was error, arguing that their explanation sufficed to create a triable issue of fact as to whether Bianco acted negligently (compare, Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361 with Ugarriza v Schmieder, 46 NY2d 471). We disagree.

Bianco was under a duty to maintain a safe distance between the two vehicles (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 [a]) and his failure to do so, in the absence of an adequate, nonnegligent explanation, constituted negligence as a matter of law (see, Opalek v Oshrain, 33 AD2d 521). Nor is the right of an innocent passenger to summary judgment in any way restricted by questions of comparative negligence which may exist as between [834]*834appellants and the driver of the vehicle in front (see, Kiernan v Edwards, 97 AD2d 750). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Balladares v. City of New York
2019 NY Slip Op 8549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Romain v. City of New York
2019 NY Slip Op 7885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Jung v. Glover
2019 NY Slip Op 1066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Phillip v. D&D Carting Co., Inc.
136 A.D.3d 18 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Pinilla v. New York City Transit Authority
122 A.D.3d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Rodriguez v. Farrell
115 A.D.3d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Brabham v. City of New York
105 A.D.3d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Anzel v. Pistorino
105 A.D.3d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Medina v. Rodriguez
92 A.D.3d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Lin v. Dial Container Service, Inc.
90 A.D.3d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Salus v. Sivan
534 F. Supp. 2d 430 (S.D. New York, 2008)
Insinga v. F.C. General Contracting
33 A.D.3d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Pearsall v. Saracco
305 A.D.2d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Dickie v. Pei Xiang Shi
304 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Vecchio v. Hildebrand
304 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
McGregor v. Frank Manzo
295 A.D.2d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
McKeough v. Rogak
288 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Dileo v. Greenstein
281 A.D.2d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Lifshits v. Variety Poly Bags
278 A.D.2d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Won-Jin Kim v. Sgaraglio
276 A.D.2d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 A.D.2d 833, 486 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silberman-v-surrey-cadillac-limousine-service-inc-nyappdiv-1985.