Selden v. Bennett

District of Columbia

Selden v. Bennett

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedMay 26, 2011

DocketCivil Action No. 2011-0733

StatusPublished

This text of Selden v. Bennett (Selden v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selden v. Bennett, (D.D.C. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT C0URT MAY 2 5 gg"

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA clark U S Dlstri t " ' ' C &Bank

C°W!S for the D|strlct of Colglrligia GLENN LEE SELDEN, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. ll-0733 TERRYN H. BENNET, et al., § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the Court would consider the plaintiff s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, the plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l 5(a)(2). Although the plaintiff has submitted additional papers, including several exhibits related to his Florida conviction, to date, he has not submitted the required financial information Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prej udice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: B/ l l United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT C0URT MAY 2 5 gg"

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA clark U S Dlstri t " ' ' C &Bank

C°W!S for the D|strlct of Colglrligia GLENN LEE SELDEN, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. ll-0733 TERRYN H. BENNET, et al., § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the Court would consider the plaintiff s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, the plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l 5(a)(2). Although the plaintiff has submitted additional papers, including several exhibits related to his Florida conviction, to date, he has not submitted the required financial information Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prej udice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: B/ l l United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Selden v. Bennett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selden-v-bennett-dcd-2011.