Sekulov v. City of Warren

Michigan Court of Appeals

Sekulov v. City of Warren

677 N.W.2d 378, 256 Mich. App. 801

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 14, 2003

DocketDocket No. 228159

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 677 N.W.2d 378 (Sekulov v. City of Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sekulov v. City of Warren, 677 N.W.2d 378, 256 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

On reconsideration following remand from the Supreme Court, 468 Mich 863 (2003), in light of Adams v Dep’t of Transportation, 253 Mich App 431 (2002), we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for defendant Macomb County. Because the decision in Nawrocki v Macomb Co Rd Comm, 463 Mich 143; 615 NW2d 702 (2000), and, by implication, the decision in Hanson v Mecosta Co Bd of Co Rd Comm’rs, 465 Mich 492; 638 NW2d 396 (2002), must be applied retroactively, plaintiffs claims do not fall within the highway exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1402(1). Our previous affirmance of the grant of summary disposition with respect to defendant city of Warren remains valid for the reasons stated in Part iv of our earlier opinion, Sekulov v Warren, 251 Mich App 333; 650 NW2d 397 (2002), which opinion was vacated by the Supreme Court in the order remanding this matter for our reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On reconsideration following remand from the Supreme Court, 468 Mich 863 (2003), in light of Adams v Dep’t of Transportation, 253 Mich App 431 (2002), we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for defendant Macomb County. Because the decision in Nawrocki v Macomb Co Rd Comm, 463 Mich 143; 615 NW2d 702 (2000), and, by implication, the decision in Hanson v Mecosta Co Bd of Co Rd Comm’rs, 465 Mich 492; 638 NW2d 396 (2002), must be applied retroactively, plaintiffs claims do not fall within the highway exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1402(1). Our previous affirmance of the grant of summary disposition with respect to defendant city of Warren remains valid for the reasons stated in Part iv of our earlier opinion, Sekulov v Warren, 251 Mich App 333; 650 NW2d 397 (2002), which opinion was vacated by the Supreme Court in the order remanding this matter for our reconsideration.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 N.W.2d 378, 256 Mich. App. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sekulov-v-city-of-warren-michctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack