Sekoh v. Werner
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1952
DANNY J. SEKOH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CRAIG WERNER, Division Manager; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:04-cv-00893-BO)
Submitted: March 21, 2007 Decided: April 12, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny J. Sekoh, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Ballantine Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Danny J. Sekoh appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his
civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Sekoh v. Werner, No. 5:04-cv-00893-BO
(E.D.N.C. July 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sekoh v. Werner (Sekoh v. Werner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.