Sekoh v. Werner

Fourth Circuit

Sekoh v. Werner

223 F. App'x 263

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2007·No. No. 06-1952·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Danny J. Sekoh appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sekoh v. Werner, No. 5:04-cv-00893-BO (E.D.N.C. July 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Danny J. Sekoh appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sekoh v. Werner, No. 5:04-cv-00893-BO (E.D.N.C. July 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sekoh v. Werner, 223 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

223 F. App'x 263 (Sekoh v. Werner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.