Seifried v. Shell Lumber & Hardware Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seifried v. Shell Lumber & Hardware Company

619 So. 2d 526, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6669, 1993 WL 217197

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 1993

DocketNo. 93-281

StatusPublished

This text of 619 So. 2d 526 (Seifried v. Shell Lumber & Hardware Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seifried v. Shell Lumber & Hardware Company, 619 So. 2d 526, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6669, 1993 WL 217197 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Because the appeals referee’s determination that appellant was not guilty of misconduct, see Varig Brazilian Airlines v. Florida Department of Commerce, 354 So.2d 921 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), was supported by competent evidence, it was unjustifiably reversed by the Unemployment Appeals Commission on the basis of its own conclusion that he was. See Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc., 617 So.2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Iglesias v. Eagle Nat’l Bank of Miami, 598 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the order below is reversed with directions to afford Seifried the unemployment benefits claimed.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the appeals referee’s determination that appellant was not guilty of misconduct, see Varig Brazilian Airlines v. Florida Department of Commerce, 354 So.2d 921 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), was supported by competent evidence, it was unjustifiably reversed by the Unemployment Appeals Commission on the basis of its own conclusion that he was. See Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc., 617 So.2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Iglesias v. Eagle Nat’l Bank of Miami, 598 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the order below is reversed with directions to afford Seifried the unemployment benefits claimed.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 So. 2d 526, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6669, 1993 WL 217197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seifried-v-shell-lumber-hardware-company-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack