Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc.

617 So. 2d 403, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4550, 1993 WL 120536
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2134
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 617 So. 2d 403 (Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc., 617 So. 2d 403, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4550, 1993 WL 120536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appeals referee’s determination that the appellant was laid off due to lack of work was supported by competent evidence, it was unjustifiably reversed by the Unemployment Appeals Commission on the basis of its own finding that she voluntarily quit. Iglesias v. Eagle Nat’l Bank of Miami, 598 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the order below is reversed with directions to afford Cheung the unemployment benefits claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc.
638 So. 2d 82 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Seifried v. Shell Lumber & Hardware Company
619 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
617 So. 2d 403, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4550, 1993 WL 120536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheung-v-executive-china-doral-inc-fladistctapp-1993.