Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc.
This text of 617 So. 2d 403 (Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the appeals referee’s determination that the appellant was laid off due to lack of work was supported by competent evidence, it was unjustifiably reversed by the Unemployment Appeals Commission on the basis of its own finding that she voluntarily quit. Iglesias v. Eagle Nat’l Bank of Miami, 598 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the order below is reversed with directions to afford Cheung the unemployment benefits claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
617 So. 2d 403, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4550, 1993 WL 120536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheung-v-executive-china-doral-inc-fladistctapp-1993.