Seidenbach v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
151 F.2d 189, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2924
Opinion
An examination of the record and briefs in this case discloses that the issues presented do not differ substantially from those decided by this court in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Seidenbach, 10 Cir., 133 F.2d 573. Accordingly, on authority of that case and Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. Seidenbach, Okl.Sup., 75 P.2d 442, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seidenbach v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 151 F.2d 189, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2924 (10th Cir. 1945).
151 F.2d 189 (Seidenbach v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. Seidenbach
1937 OK 701 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Seidenbach
133 F.2d 573 (Tenth Circuit, 1942)