Seiden v. . Reimer
134 N.E. 585, 232 N.Y. 593, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1175
Opinion
Judgment in each case affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: His cock, Ch. J., and McLaughlin, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seiden v. . Reimer, 134 N.E. 585, 232 N.Y. 593, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1175 (N.Y. 1922).
134 N.E. 585 (Seiden v. . Reimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barone v. Cox
51 A.D.2d 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Combes v. Snow
351 P.2d 419 (Washington Supreme Court, 1960)
Anonymous v. Anonymous
7 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Pacilio v. Scarpati
165 Misc. 586 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1937)
Clark v. Hampton
145 A. 265 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1929)