Anonymous v. Anonymous
This text of 7 A.D.2d 932 (Anonymous v. Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding to obtain custody of a child, the appeal is (1) from an order dismissing the writ, and (2) from so much of an order as denied appellant’s motion to vacate the order dismissing the writ and to set aside the habeas corpus proceeding. Appellant, an infant, asserts that the order dismissing the writ should have been vacated because no guardian ad litem had been appointed for her prior to the determination of the proceeding. Appeals dismissed, without costs. The order should have been, and may still be, vacated on a proper application for such relief (see Anderson v. Anderson, 164 App. Div. 812; Byrnes v. Byrnes, 109 App. Div. 535; Seiden v. Reimer, 190 App. Div. 713, affd. 232 N. Y. 593; 19 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, p. 671; cf. Civ. Prac. Act, § 109). However, the appeals are not properly before us, since no guardian has been appointed to prosecute th'em. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.D.2d 932, 183 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anonymous-v-anonymous-nyappdiv-1959.