Segar v. Lounsbury

211 A.2d 695, 152 Conn. 721
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 15, 1965·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The workmen’s compensation commissioner found that the plaintiff sustained injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment after a slight deviation from the normal course of his usual duties for his employer. The issue was one of fact which was decided by the commissioner adversely to the claims of the defendants. Labbe v. American Brass Co., 132 Conn. 606, 609, 46 A.2d 339. That decision withstands attack.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Segar v. Lounsbury, 211 A.2d 695, 152 Conn. 721 (Colo. 1965).

211 A.2d 695 (Segar v. Lounsbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Labbe v. American Brass Co.
46 A.2d 339 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1946)