Segar v. Lounsbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Segar v. Lounsbury

211 A.2d 695, 152 Conn. 721

DecidedJune 15, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 211 A.2d 695 (Segar v. Lounsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Segar v. Lounsbury, 211 A.2d 695, 152 Conn. 721 (Colo. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The workmen’s compensation commissioner found that the plaintiff sustained injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment after a slight deviation from the normal course of his usual duties for his employer. The issue was one of fact which was decided by the commissioner adversely to the claims of the defendants. Labbe v. American Brass Co., 132 Conn. 606, 609, 46 A.2d 339. That decision withstands attack.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The workmen’s compensation commissioner found that the plaintiff sustained injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment after a slight deviation from the normal course of his usual duties for his employer. The issue was one of fact which was decided by the commissioner adversely to the claims of the defendants. Labbe v. American Brass Co., 132 Conn. 606, 609, 46 A.2d 339. That decision withstands attack.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.2d 695, 152 Conn. 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segar-v-lounsbury-conn-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack