Segar v. Lounsbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Segar v. Lounsbury

205 A.2d 200, 152 Conn. 733

DecidedDecember 1, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.2d 200 (Segar v. Lounsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Segar v. Lounsbury, 205 A.2d 200, 152 Conn. 733 (Colo. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the defendants in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in Tolland County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court of Errors, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Argued December 1 decided December 1, 1964 Donald P. Chernoff, for the appellants (defendants).

The defendants filed a motion for reargument which was granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the defendants in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in Tolland County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court of Errors, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Argued December 1 decided December 1, 1964 Donald P. Chernoff, for the appellants (defendants).

The defendants filed a motion for reargument which was granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.2d 200, 152 Conn. 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segar-v-lounsbury-conn-1964.