Seelig v. United States

Supreme Court

Seelig v. United States

370 U.S. 293, 82 S. Ct. 1560, 8 L. Ed. 2d 501, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1083

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 18, 1962

Docket841, Misc

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 370 U.S. 293 (Seelig v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seelig v. United States, 370 U.S. 293, 82 S. Ct. 1560, 8 L. Ed. 2d 501, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1083 (1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in the light of Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674, and Coppedge v. United States, 369 U. S. 438.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in the light of Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674, and Coppedge v. United States, 369 U. S. 438.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

370 U.S. 293, 82 S. Ct. 1560, 8 L. Ed. 2d 501, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seelig-v-united-states-scotus-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack