S.E.D. v. G.D.M.
This text of S.E.D. v. G.D.M. (S.E.D. v. G.D.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J. S52030/16
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
S.E.D. : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA v. : : G.D.M., : No. 53 EDA 2016 : Appellant :
Appeal from the Order Entered December 7, 2015 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Domestic Relations Division at No. #0C0513395
BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., STABILE AND STRASSBURGER,* JJ.
DISSENTING MEMORANDUM STATEMENT BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: FILED NOVEMBER 18, 2016
I respectfully dissent. I would remand to the trial court to make a final
custody determination utilizing the 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 5328 factors. Clearly,
Mother did not voluntarily agree to any custody arrangement; rather, she
believed this was the best deal she could get from Father. However, it was
not up to Father to make this determination. It was for the trial court when
Mother obviously expressed her inability to deal with Father. To date, there
has never been a final determination as to why a physical and legal change
of custody was made in this case. This is the basis of Mother’s appeal.
* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
S.E.D. v. G.D.M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sed-v-gdm-pasuperct-2016.