Security State Bank of Pharr, Texas v. W. B. Uhlhorn, D/B/A Uhlhorn Construction Company

Fifth Circuit

Security State Bank of Pharr, Texas v. W. B. Uhlhorn, D/B/A Uhlhorn Construction Company

325 F.2d 92

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 27, 1963·No. 20681·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the contention of the appellant that House Bill No. 698, Acts of 1957, 55th Leg., page 818, chapter 348, of the State of Texas, requiring the assignment of certain contracts to be recorded in a specific manner, is unconstitutional. The relevant facts and the discussion of the constitutional issue are fully set out in the judgment of the district court in 211 F.Supp. 798. We conclude that the determination of the trial court as set forth in its opinion should be affirmed.

Approving the decision, as we do, we affirm the judgment on the reasoning contained in the opinion of the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the contention of the appellant that House Bill No. 698, Acts of 1957, 55th Leg., page 818, chapter 348, of the State of Texas, requiring the assignment of certain contracts to be recorded in a specific manner, is unconstitutional. The relevant facts and the discussion of the constitutional issue are fully set out in the judgment of the district court in 211 F.Supp. 798. We conclude that the determination of the trial court as set forth in its opinion should be affirmed.

Approving the decision, as we do, we affirm the judgment on the reasoning contained in the opinion of the trial court.

Security State Bank of Pharr, Texas v. W. B. Uhlhorn, D/B/A Uhlhorn Construction Company, 325 F.2d 92 (5th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

325 F.2d 92 (Security State Bank of Pharr, Texas v. W. B. Uhlhorn, D/B/A Uhlhorn Construction Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related