Security Life & Accident Insurance v. Crescent Realty Co.

143 So. 2d 441, 273 Ala. 624, 1962 Ala. LEXIS 429
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 21, 1962
Docket3 Div. 922
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 143 So. 2d 441 (Security Life & Accident Insurance v. Crescent Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Security Life & Accident Insurance v. Crescent Realty Co., 143 So. 2d 441, 273 Ala. 624, 1962 Ala. LEXIS 429 (Ala. 1962).

Opinion

GOODWYN, Justice.

Crescent Realty Company, a corporation, filed in the circuit court of Montgomery County, in equity, a bill for declaratory judgment against Homeland Insurance Company, a corporation. T. D. Lunceford thereafter filed in said court a motion for permission and leave to intervene in the cause. The motion was granted. Lunceford then filed a bill of intervention. The respondent’s demurrer thereto being sustained, Lunceford filed an amended bill of intervention. Respondent’s demurrer thereto was overruled. From the decree overruling said demurrer an appeal was taken by “Security Life & Accident Insurance Company, a corporation, into which the Respondent, Homeland Insurance Company, has heretofore been merged.”

So far as the record discloses, Homeland Insurance Company is still the only respondent in the cause; but the appeal was not taken by it. Security Life & Accident Insurance Company not being a party, it was without authority to bring the appeal. As said in Pake v. Leinkauf Banking Company, 186 Ala. 307, 309, 65 So. 139, 140, viz: “A person not a party to a cause cannot prosecute an appeal to this court, * * See also: Lusk v. Britton, 198 Ala. 245, 73 So. 492; May v. Courtnay, Tennant & Co., 47 Ala. 185.

We note that the appeal was taken prior to passage of Act No. 72, appvd. Sept. 15, 1961, Laws 1961, Sp.Sess., p. 1947, amending § 755, Tit. 7, Code 1940, and providing that a decree overruling or sustaining a demurrer to a bill or cross-bill in equity is not appealable.

We have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robino v. Kilgore
838 So. 2d 366 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2002)
Schultz v. State
583 So. 2d 997 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Duncan v. First Nat. Bank of Jasper
573 So. 2d 270 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)
Simmons v. Clark Equipment Credit Corp.
554 So. 2d 398 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)
Daughtry v. MOBILE CTY. SHERIFF'S DEPT.
536 So. 2d 953 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
Sho-Me Motor Lodges v. JEHLE-SLAUSON CONST.
466 So. 2d 83 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Thagard v. Brock
210 So. 2d 821 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968)
City of Mobile v. Gulf Development Co.
171 So. 2d 247 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 So. 2d 441, 273 Ala. 624, 1962 Ala. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-life-accident-insurance-v-crescent-realty-co-ala-1962.