Pake v. Leinkauf Bank. Co.

65 So. 139, 186 Ala. 307, 1914 Ala. LEXIS 362
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 14, 1914·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

de GRAFFENRIED, J. —

In the case of Ex parte Rebecca Jonas, infra, 64 South. 960, this court held that the decretal order removing Harry B. Pake as trustee was not such an order as would support an appeal to this court by said Harry B. Pake. For the reasons set out in the opinion in the above-cited cause, the appeal in [309]*309the case at bar is dismissed from the docket of this court.

In this proceeding, Pillans, Hanaw & Pillans, who are not parties to this cause but who are of counsel for Harry B..Pake, who was, until his removal as trustee, one of the parties to the cause, have appealed to this court from the decree fixing the amount of their counsel fees. A person not a party to a cause cannot prosecute an appeal to this court, and for that reason the appeal of said Pillans, Hanaw & Pillans is hereby dismissed out of this court.

Appeals dismissed.

All the Justices cncur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pake v. Leinkauf Bank. Co., 65 So. 139, 186 Ala. 307, 1914 Ala. LEXIS 362 (Ala. 1914).

65 So. 139 (Pake v. Leinkauf Bank. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schultz v. State
583 So. 2d 997 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Duncan v. First Nat. Bank of Jasper
573 So. 2d 270 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)
Daughtry v. MOBILE CTY. SHERIFF'S DEPT.
536 So. 2d 953 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
Maroney v. Liberty Loan Corporation
326 So. 2d 752 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Security Life & Accident Insurance v. Crescent Realty Co.
143 So. 2d 441 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
Monroe v. Winn
133 P.2d 952 (Washington Supreme Court, 1943)
Crunden-Martin Manufacturing Co. v. Christy
188 P. 875 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1920)
Horst v. Pake
71 So. 430 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)