Security First National Bank v. Denton

California Court of Appeal

Security First National Bank v. Denton

54 P.2d 504, 11 Cal. App. 2d 707

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 13, 1936

DocketCiv. No. 1767

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 P.2d 504 (Security First National Bank v. Denton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Security First National Bank v. Denton, 54 P.2d 504, 11 Cal. App. 2d 707 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

11 Cal.App.2d 707 (1936)

SECURITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a National Banking Corporation), as Administrator, etc., Respondent,
v.
MILDRED B. DENTON et al., Defendants; MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.

Civ. No. 1767.

California Court of Appeals. Fourth Appellate District.

February 13, 1936.

John Ralph Wilson and McKinstry, Haber & Coombes for Appellants.

William C. Crossland for Respondent.

The Court.

[1] The respondent herein has confessed error in the record and all parties have stipulated that the judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings and that the remittitur be issued forthwith.

The errors pointed out appear to be material, prejudicial and sufficient to justify a reversal.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, the remittitur to issue forthwith. *708

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11 Cal.App.2d 707 (1936)

SECURITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a National Banking Corporation), as Administrator, etc., Respondent,
v.
MILDRED B. DENTON et al., Defendants; MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.

Civ. No. 1767.

California Court of Appeals. Fourth Appellate District.

February 13, 1936.

John Ralph Wilson and McKinstry, Haber & Coombes for Appellants.

William C. Crossland for Respondent.

The Court.

[1] The respondent herein has confessed error in the record and all parties have stipulated that the judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings and that the remittitur be issued forthwith.

The errors pointed out appear to be material, prejudicial and sufficient to justify a reversal.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, the remittitur to issue forthwith. *708

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 P.2d 504, 11 Cal. App. 2d 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-first-national-bank-v-denton-calctapp-1936.

Opinion

SECURITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a National Banking Corporation), as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. MILDRED B. DENTON et al., Defendants; MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

SECURITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a National Banking Corporation), as Administrator, etc., Respondent,
v.
MILDRED B. DENTON et al., Defendants; MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.