Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., Eugene W. Bell, Trustee for the Liquidation of Joseph Sebag Incorporated ("Bell") Laurence A. Schroeder, Successor Trustee for the Liquidation of First State Securities Corporation ("Schroeder") v. Seymour Vigman, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr.

964 F.2d 924, 92 Daily Journal DAR 6741, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4264, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 11001
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 1992
Docket89-55094
StatusPublished

This text of 964 F.2d 924 (Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., Eugene W. Bell, Trustee for the Liquidation of Joseph Sebag Incorporated ("Bell") Laurence A. Schroeder, Successor Trustee for the Liquidation of First State Securities Corporation ("Schroeder") v. Seymour Vigman, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., Eugene W. Bell, Trustee for the Liquidation of Joseph Sebag Incorporated ("Bell") Laurence A. Schroeder, Successor Trustee for the Liquidation of First State Securities Corporation ("Schroeder") v. Seymour Vigman, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., 964 F.2d 924, 92 Daily Journal DAR 6741, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4264, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 11001 (1st Cir. 1992).

Opinion

964 F.2d 924

SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Seymour VIGMAN, et al., Defendants,
and
Robert G. Holmes, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.
Eugene W. BELL, Trustee for the liquidation of Joseph Sebag
Incorporated ("Bell"); Laurence A. Schroeder, Successor
Trustee for the Liquidation of First State Securities
Corporation ("Schroeder"), Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Seymour VIGMAN, et al., Defendants,
and
Robert G. Holmes, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 89-55094, 89-55128.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 19, 1992.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

The mandate of the United States Supreme Court, certified on April 27, 1992, reversed the judgment of this court published at 908 F.2d 1461 (9th Cir.1990). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, et al., --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1311, 117 L.Ed.2d 532 (1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman
964 F.2d 924 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
964 F.2d 924, 92 Daily Journal DAR 6741, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4264, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 11001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/securities-investor-protection-corporation-v-seymour-vigman-and-robert-g-ca1-1992.