Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman

Ninth Circuit

Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman

964 F.2d 924, 1992 WL 103087

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 19, 1992·No. Nos. 89-55094, 89-55128·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The mandate of the United States Supreme Court, certified on April 27, 1992, reversed the judgment of this court published at 908 F.2d 1461 (9th Cir.1990). Accordingly, we remand this ease to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, et al., — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1311, 117 L.Ed.2d 532 (1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The mandate of the United States Supreme Court, certified on April 27, 1992, reversed the judgment of this court published at 908 F.2d 1461 (9th Cir.1990). Accordingly, we remand this ease to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, et al., — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1311, 117 L.Ed.2d 532 (1992).

Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman, 964 F.2d 924, 1992 WL 103087 (9th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

964 F.2d 924 (Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., Eugene W. Bell, Trustee for the Liquidation of Joseph Sebag Incorporated ("Bell") Laurence A. Schroeder, Successor Trustee for the Liquidation of First State Securities Corporation ("Schroeder") v. Seymour Vigman, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr.

964 F.2d 924 (First Circuit, 1992)

Opinion

Related