Securities and Exchange Commission v. Minuskin

District Court, S.D. California·Decided December 16, 2022·No. 3:22-cv-00483·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 3:22-cv-00483-RSH-AHG COMMISSION, 13 ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff, JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE 14 EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION v. 15 CONFERENCE AND CASE THOMAS F. CASEY; GOLDEN MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 16 GENESIS, INC.; et al., 17 [ECF No. 28] Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court is the parties’ joint Motion to Continue the Early Neutral 20 Evaluation (“ENE”) and Case Management Conference (“CMC”) currently set for 21 January 4, 2023. ECF No 28. 22 Parties seeking to continue an ENE must demonstrate good cause. ECF No. 26 at 6 23 (“An ENE may be rescheduled only upon a showing of good cause”); Chmb.R. at 2 (stating 24 that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”); see 25 FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court 26 may, for good cause, extend the time”). 27 “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across 28 procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 1 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence of the party seeking to 2 amend the scheduling order and the reasons for seeking modification. Johnson v. Mammoth 3 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). 4 Here, the parties represent to the Court that counsel for Defendants has a conflict on 5 the same date as the ENE in this case—a family vacation during the first week of January, 6 booked one year ago. ECF No. 28 at 2. Accordingly, the parties request that both the ENE 7 and CMC be continued to January 19, 2023. Id. 8 The Court finds good cause to GRANT IN PART1 the Motion. The Court 9 ORDERS the following: 10 1. The ENE and CMC originally rescheduled for January 4, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. 11 are hereby CONTINUED to January 26, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge 12 Allison H. Goddard. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court requires attendance of 13 all parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, and the 14 primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation via videoconference. CivLR 16.1(c)(1). 15 2. Purpose of the Conference: The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal 16 discussion between the attorneys and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in 17 an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. All conference discussions will be 18 informal, off the record, and confidential. 19 3. Full Settlement Authority Required: A party or party representative with 20 full and complete authority to enter into a binding settlement must be present via 21 videoconference. Full authority to settle means that a person must be authorized to fully 22 explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to 23 the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 24 25 26 1 The parties requested that the continued ENE and CMC take place on January 19, 2023 27 at 2:00 p.m. ECF No. 28 at 2. Though the Court appreciates that the parties worked together to find a mutually agreeable date, the Court does not have that date and time available on 28 1 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the 2 settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D. 3 Ariz. 2003). Limited or sum certain authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, 4 Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595–97 (8th Cir. 2001). A person who needs to call another person 5 who is not present on the videoconference before agreeing to any settlement does not 6 have full authority. 7 4. Confidential ENE Statements Required: No later than January 17, 2023,2 8 the parties shall submit confidential statements of five (5) pages or less directly to the 9 chambers of Magistrate Judge Goddard outlining the nature of the case, the claims, and the 10 defenses. These statements shall not be filed or served on opposing counsel. They shall 11 be lodged via email at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. The ENE statement is limited to 12 five (5) pages or less, and up to five (5) pages of exhibits or declarations. Each party’s 13 ENE statement must outline: 14 A. the nature of the case and the claims, 15 B. position on liability or defense, 16 C. position regarding settlement of the case with a specific3 17 demand/offer for settlement,4 and 18 D. any previous settlement negotiations or mediation efforts. 19 5. Case Management Conference: In the event the case does not settle at the 20 ENE, the Court will immediately thereafter hold a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) 21

22 23 2 Certain parties have already submitted their ENE Statements, and those parties are not required to submit any further Statements unless they so prefer. 24 25 3 A general statement, such as that a party “will negotiate in good faith,” is a not a specific demand or offer. 26

27 4 If a specific demand or offer cannot be made at the time the ENE statement is submitted, then the reasons as to why a demand or offer cannot be made must be stated. Further, the 28 1 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). Appearance of the parties at the CMC is not required. 2 The deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order originally resetting ENE and CMC (see ECF 3 No. 26 at 3) remain in place. The Court notes that, although it is unable to set the ENE 4 within the standard 45-day timeframe after the filing of the first Answer, the Court will 5 consider discovery to be open after the parties met and conferred pursuant to Rule 26, and 6 will take this deadline into account when setting the case schedule during the CMC. 7 6. Appearances via Videoconference Required: All named parties, party 8 representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, as well as principal 9 attorney(s) responsible for the litigation must attend the ENE via videoconference. All who 10 attend the ENE must be legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case. 11 Counsel appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement 12 authority) will be subject to immediate imposition of sanctions. To facilitate the 13 videoconference ENE, the Court hereby orders as follows: 14 A. The Court will use its official Zoom video conferencing account to hold 15 the ENE. If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: Zoom is available on 16 computers through a download on the Zoom website 17 (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the 18 installation of a free app.5 Joining a Zoom conference does not require 19 creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file 20 (if using a computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). Participants 21 are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom and familiarize 22 themselves with Zoom in advance of the ENE.6 There is a cost-free 23 option for creating a Zoom account. 24

25 5 If possible, participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video 26 conference, rather than mobile devices. 27 6 For help getting started with Zoom, visit: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en- 28 1 B. Prior to the start of the ENE, the Court will email each participant an 2 invitation to join a Zoom video conference.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Minuskin, (S.D. Cal. 2022).

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Minuskin (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Minuskin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related