Securities and Exchange Commission v. Minuskin

District Court, S.D. California·Decided December 16, 2022·No. 3:22-cv-00483·Unknown

Opinion

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 3:22-cv-00483-RSH-AHG COMMISSION, ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff, JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION v. THOMAS F. CASEY; GOLDEN MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE GENESIS, INC.; et al., [ECF No. 28] Defendants. Before the Court is the parties’ joint Motion to Continue the Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) and Case Management Conference (“CMC”) currently set for January 4, 2023. ECF No 28. Parties seeking to continue an ENE must demonstrate good cause. ECF No. 26 at 6 (“An ENE may be rescheduled only upon a showing of good cause”); Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”); see FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time”). “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence of the party seeking to amend the scheduling order and the reasons for seeking modification. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). Here, the parties represent to the Court that counsel for Defendants has a conflict on the same date as the ENE in this case—a family vacation during the first week of January, booked one year ago. ECF No. 28 at 2. Accordingly, the parties request that both the ENE and CMC be continued to January 19, 2023. Id. The Court finds good cause to GRANT IN PART1 the Motion. The Court ORDERS the following: 1. The ENE and CMC originally rescheduled for January 4, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. are hereby CONTINUED to January 26, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court requires attendance of all parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, and the primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation via videoconference. CivLR 16.1(c)(1). 2. Purpose of the Conference: The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal discussion between the attorneys and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, and confidential. 3. Full Settlement Authority Required: A party or party representative with full and complete authority to enter into a binding settlement must be present via videoconference. Full authority to settle means that a person must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1 The parties requested that the continued ENE and CMC take place on January 19, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. ECF No. 28 at 2. Though the Court appreciates that the parties worked together to find a mutually agreeable date, the Court does not have that date and time available on 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D. Ariz. 2003). Limited or sum certain authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595–97 (8th Cir. 2001). A person who needs to call another person who is not present on the videoconference before agreeing to any settlement does not have full authority. 4. Confidential ENE Statements Required: No later than January 17, 2023,2 the parties shall submit confidential statements of five (5) pages or less directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Goddard outlining the nature of the case, the claims, and the defenses. These statements shall not be filed or served on opposing counsel. They shall be lodged via email at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. The ENE statement is limited to five (5) pages or less, and up to five (5) pages of exhibits or declarations. Each party’s ENE statement must outline: A. the nature of the case and the claims, B. position on liability or defense, C. position regarding settlement of the case with a specific3 demand/offer for settlement,4 and D. any previous settlement negotiations or mediation efforts. 5. Case Management Conference: In the event the case does not settle at the ENE, the Court will immediately thereafter hold a Case Management Conference (“CMC”)

2 Certain parties have already submitted their ENE Statements, and those parties are not required to submit any further Statements unless they so prefer. 3 A general statement, such as that a party “will negotiate in good faith,” is a not a specific demand or offer.

4 If a specific demand or offer cannot be made at the time the ENE statement is submitted, then the reasons as to why a demand or offer cannot be made must be stated. Further, the pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). Appearance of the parties at the CMC is not required. The deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order originally resetting ENE and CMC (see ECF No. 26 at 3) remain in place. The Court notes that, although it is unable to set the ENE within the standard 45-day timeframe after the filing of the first Answer, the Court will consider discovery to be open after the parties met and conferred pursuant to Rule 26, and will take this deadline into account when setting the case schedule during the CMC. 6. Appearances via Videoconference Required: All named parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, as well as principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation must attend the ENE via videoconference. All who attend the ENE must be legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case. Counsel appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority) will be subject to immediate imposition of sanctions. To facilitate the videoconference ENE, the Court hereby orders as follows: A. The Court will use its official Zoom video conferencing account to hold the ENE. If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: Zoom is available on computers through a download on the Zoom website (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the installation of a free app.5 Joining a Zoom conference does not require creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file (if using a computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). Participants are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom and familiarize themselves with Zoom in advance of the ENE.6 There is a cost-free option for creating a Zoom account.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Minuskin, (S.D. Cal. 2022).

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Minuskin (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Minuskin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related