Secor v. Fulton

Supreme Court

Secor v. Fulton

293 U.S. 517, 55 S. Ct. 74

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 8, 1934·No. No. 77·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U. S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, 292 U. S. 610; Van Schaick v. Toledo, 292 U. S. 611.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U. S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, 292 U. S. 610; Van Schaick v. Toledo, 292 U. S. 611.

Secor v. Fulton, 293 U.S. 517, 55 S. Ct. 74 (1934).

Pincite

293 U.S. 517 (Secor v. Fulton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related