Secor v. Fulton
This text of 293 U.S. 517 (Secor v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U. S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, 292 U. S. 610; Van Schaick v. Toledo, 292 U. S. 611.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 U.S. 517, 55 S. Ct. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/secor-v-fulton-scotus-1934.