Comer v. Washington

Supreme Court

Comer v. Washington

292 U.S. 610, 54 S. Ct. 782

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 21, 1934·No. No. 1025·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 [611]*611U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273.

Mr. Ewing D. Colvin for appellant. Mr. John J. Sullivan for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 [611]*611U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273.

Mr. Ewing D. Colvin for appellant. Mr. John J. Sullivan for appellee.

Comer v. Washington, 292 U.S. 610, 54 S. Ct. 782 (1934).

Pincite

292 U.S. 610 (Comer v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related