Seawright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Seawright v. State

316 S.E.2d 168, 170 Ga. App. 58, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1797

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 29, 1984

Docket67937

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 316 S.E.2d 168 (Seawright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seawright v. State, 316 S.E.2d 168, 170 Ga. App. 58, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1797 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

The appellant and two companions were indicted for the offenses of kidnapping, rape, armed robbery, and aggravated sodomy. This appeal follows the appellant’s conviction of robbery by intimidation and simple battery as included offenses of the armed robbery and rape charges, respectively. He was found not guilty of kidnapping and aggravated sodomy. In his sole enumeration of error, the appellant complains of the trial court’s failure to charge on theft by taking as a lesser included offense of armed robbery. Held:

It is clear from the record that there was no evidence to support a charge on theft by taking. The victim testified that her purse was taken at knife point. The appellant did not testify. A co-defendant who did testify denied any taking whatsoever.

Appellant’s reliance upon Hensley v. State, 228 Ga. 501 (186 SE2d 729) (1972), is misplaced. While the defendants in that case denied taking the victim’s property while holding him at knife point, they did admit taking his property, and it was this admission that authorized a conviction of theft by taking.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

The appellant and two companions were indicted for the offenses of kidnapping, rape, armed robbery, and aggravated sodomy. This appeal follows the appellant’s conviction of robbery by intimidation and simple battery as included offenses of the armed robbery and rape charges, respectively. He was found not guilty of kidnapping and aggravated sodomy. In his sole enumeration of error, the appellant complains of the trial court’s failure to charge on theft by taking as a lesser included offense of armed robbery. Held:

It is clear from the record that there was no evidence to support a charge on theft by taking. The victim testified that her purse was taken at knife point. The appellant did not testify. A co-defendant who did testify denied any taking whatsoever.

Appellant’s reliance upon Hensley v. State, 228 Ga. 501 (186 SE2d 729) (1972), is misplaced. While the defendants in that case denied taking the victim’s property while holding him at knife point, they did admit taking his property, and it was this admission that authorized a conviction of theft by taking.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

316 S.E.2d 168, 170 Ga. App. 58, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seawright-v-state-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack