Seaview Chef, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.

61 A.D.2d 1043, 403 N.Y.S.2d 123, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10712
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 1043 (Seaview Chef, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seaview Chef, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance Co., 61 A.D.2d 1043, 403 N.Y.S.2d 123, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

In an action by a mortgagee on a policy of fire insurance, defendant Transamerica Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 24, 1977, as denied its motion for a protective order. Order modified by adding thereto, after the provision that the motion for a protective order is denied, a further provision that such denial is as to those reports, writings, etc., which were prepared and received by appellant prior to January 3, 1977, and that the motion for a protective order is granted as to such items which were prepared and received by appellant after that date. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The fire occurred on or about October 24, 1976. On January 3, 1977 a report was received from the fire department which indicated that the fire was of suspicious origin. At that time, appellant had "substantial bona fide reasons to investigate the legitimacy of the loss” (Mold Maintenance Serv. v General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp., 56 AD2d 134, 135; see, also Kent v Maryland Cas. Co., 25 AD2d 653). Although the [1044]*1044claim had not yet been rejected, it appears that reports made to it beyond that time were intended to aid in the resistance of the claim and prepared for litigation (cf. Millen Ind. v American Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 37 AD2d 817; CPLR 3101, subd [d]). Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Landmark Insurance v. Beau Rivage Restaurant, Inc.
121 A.D.2d 98 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Moskowitz v. Traveler's Indemnity Co.
91 A.D.2d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Hawley v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
90 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Hamdan v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
116 Misc. 2d 706 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Ogden v. Allstate Insurance
112 Misc. 2d 891 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance
91 F.R.D. 420 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Nicolazzi v. Travelers Insurance
106 Misc. 2d 718 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Rossi v. Hartford Fire Insurance
72 A.D.2d 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Abraham v. Hanover Insurance
66 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A.D.2d 1043, 403 N.Y.S.2d 123, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaview-chef-inc-v-transamerica-insurance-co-nyappdiv-1978.