Kent v. Maryland Casualty Co.

25 A.D.2d 653, 268 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4613
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 1966·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

'Order entered October 21, 1965, denying defendant’s motion made pursuant to CPLR 3101 (subd. [d]) and 3103, for a protective order against the examination before trial by plaintiff of defendant’s independent auditor, employed by defendant to audit plaintiff’s books under the policy of robbery and burglary insurance upon which plaintiff has brought suit herein, reversed on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 eosts and disbursements to the defendant-appellant, and the motion granted. After the alleged burglary and before suit was brought, defendant employed the auditor to examine plaintiff’s books with respect to the loss, in anticipation of a claim therefor. In its answer to the complaint, defendant alleges as an affirmative defense that plaintiff failed to keep books and records of the insured property

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kent v. Maryland Casualty Co., 25 A.D.2d 653, 268 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

25 A.D.2d 653 (Kent v. Maryland Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seaview Chef, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.
61 A.D.2d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Mold Maintenance Service v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
56 A.D.2d 134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Point Tennis Co. v. Irvin Industries, Inc.
86 Misc. 231 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)