Seaton v. Seaton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Seaton v. Seaton

348 S.W.3d 863, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1266, 2011 WL 4444076

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 27, 2011·No. WD 73036·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Seaton (“Father”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Putnam County denying his motion to modify the child support provisions of the decree of dissolution of marriage between Father and Lynsey Seaton (“Mother”). After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Seaton (“Father”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Putnam County denying his motion to modify the child support provisions of the decree of dissolution of marriage between Father and Lynsey Seaton (“Mother”). After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Seaton v. Seaton, 348 S.W.3d 863, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1266, 2011 WL 4444076 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

348 S.W.3d 863 (Seaton v. Seaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related