DeJESUS-ANDUJAR v. State

348 S.W.3d 863, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1264, 2011 WL 4444070
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 27, 2011
DocketWD 72951
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 348 S.W.3d 863 (DeJESUS-ANDUJAR v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeJESUS-ANDUJAR v. State, 348 S.W.3d 863, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1264, 2011 WL 4444070 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

This is a Rule 29.15 case. Sandrio De-Jesus-Andujar (“Movant”) claims that the Circuit Court of Livingston County (“motion court”) erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion because Movant was denied effective assistance of trial counsel and the right to testify in his own defense. Mov-ant claims that neither his trial counsel nor the trial court ever told him that he could testify at his trial or that the decision whether or not to testify was his to make. He concludes that he did not voluntarily waive his right to testify. We affirm the decision of the motion court. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seaton v. Seaton
348 S.W.3d 863 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 S.W.3d 863, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1264, 2011 WL 4444070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dejesus-andujar-v-state-moctapp-2011.