DeJESUS-ANDUJAR v. State
This text of 348 S.W.3d 863 (DeJESUS-ANDUJAR v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
This is a Rule 29.15 case. Sandrio De-Jesus-Andujar (“Movant”) claims that the Circuit Court of Livingston County (“motion court”) erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion because Movant was denied effective assistance of trial counsel and the right to testify in his own defense. Mov-ant claims that neither his trial counsel nor the trial court ever told him that he could testify at his trial or that the decision whether or not to testify was his to make. He concludes that he did not voluntarily waive his right to testify. We affirm the decision of the motion court. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
348 S.W.3d 863, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1264, 2011 WL 4444070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dejesus-andujar-v-state-moctapp-2011.