Sears v. Warren
This text of Sears v. Warren (Sears v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10/13/2020 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Court for the District of Columbia
SCOTT A. SEARS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02901 (UNA) ) DR. WARREN, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff’s pro se complaint and
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court will grant the IFP
application and dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(h)(3).
Plaintiff brings undefined causes of action against “Dr. Warren,” the head psychologist at
Lompoc Residential Drug Abuse Camp. See generally Compl., Dkt. 1. Plaintiff does not provide
an address or any other identifying information for defendant or the Camp. See id. Plaintiff is
apparently dissatisfied with his treatment by Dr. Warren, whom he broadly alleges engaged in
“wrongdoing,” and argues that Dr. Warren engaged in favoritism and nepotism while treating
patients at the Camp. See id.
The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth
generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available
only when a “federal question” is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount
in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts
that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such
facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff does not raise any federal question, and has not alleged sufficient facts to satisfy
his burden to establish diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, this case will be dismissed. A separate
order accompanies this memorandum opinion.
Date: October 13, 2020
DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sears v. Warren, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sears-v-warren-dcd-2020.