Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Dixon

303 So. 2d 39, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1974·No. No. W-451·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed. See Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 224 So.2d 797 (Fla.App. 1st, 1969); Shaw v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 229 So.2d 275 (Fla.App. 1st, 1970), cert. den., 237 So.2d 540 (Fla.1970); Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Ford and Britt, 238 So.2d 473 (Fla.App. 1st, 1970), and Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. v. West, 242 So.2d 156 (Fla.App. 1st, 1971), cert. den., 246 So.2d 112 (Fla.1971). We have considered Fowler v. Chillingworth, 94 Fla. 1, 113 So. 667 (1927) cited by appellant in its reply to appellee’s motion.

RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Dixon, 303 So. 2d 39, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

303 So. 2d 39 (Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BANKERS FIRE AND CASUALTY CO. v. State
303 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)